AuthorMike ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Dundee Stress State Questionnaire Pdf10/14/2021
All questionnaires were completed in February 2016 and results were collated using Survey Monkey. Students who completed the questionnaire were studying at the University of the West of England or Bristol University. Online questionnaire was shared via Survey Monkey and social media sites like Facebook.Questions are of a general nature and are not directed at any particular sub-population group, using this abbreviated version (or any version) with a diverse population is predicted to yield equally reliable results. In addition, broader measures of psychiatric distress, including the Symptom Checklist-90, the General Health Questionnaire, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 are not included in this review since they are included elsewhere in this special issue.One of them is the New York Cognition Questionnaire (NYC- Q) 10, which is an improved and revised version of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire. Specifically, this author excluded measures typically used to evaluate diagnostic criteria or features of specific anxiety disorders, such as panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and others. To maintain brevity, the majority of the measures reviewed here were selected to provide broad coverage of general symptoms of anxiety, and measures were excluded if they are intended to identify or characterize a specific Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) anxiety disorder ( 1). For this review, the author included measures that were 1) measures of general measures of anxiety and severity of anxiety symptoms, 2) administered by self-report, 3) used in rheumatologic populations, and 4) has evidence of adequate psychometric data.
Dundee Stress State Questionnaire Download The PDFIn addition, information regarding responsiveness of each measure to longitudinal change is presented, including responsiveness to change in rheumatology when available. In this review, the content and structure of each measure is presented (number of items, recall period, response options, presence of translations, and adaptations), the use in rheumatic disease when possible is discussed, and the psychometric properties of each measure, particularly when validated in any of the rheumatic diseases, is detailed. The measures reviewed below include the State Trait Anxiety Index, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Importantly, the measures included in this review should not be interpreted as diagnostically significant for an anxiety disorder, even generalized anxiety disorder, but should be used to measure the presence of symptoms and to calibrate the severity of general symptoms of anxiety commonly occurring in rheumatic disease. Or download the PDF.However, subscales that have been used frequently in rheumatology as “stand-alone” measures, such as the anxiety scale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, are included in this review. A global measure of perceived stress.The questionnaire used in the study included sociodemographic information, working conditions, level of burnout and job stress.Nonetheless, based on this review, there currently exist measures that have good psychometric properties and adequate responsiveness to change that would warrant use in rheumatology.Current “state” anxiety pervasive “trait” anxietyState anxiety more responsive to change than trait anxiety subscaleDetection of pervasive anxiety “proneness” and current symptomsTrait scale measures longstanding traits and therefore is less sensitive to change over a short period of timeSymptoms of anxiety with a focus on somatic symptoms4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all 3 = severely)Established responsiveness to change in psychiatric and medical populationsRelatively narrow scope of symptom assessment with focus on somatic symptomsTotal anxiety 4-point Likert scale (0 = symptom absent 3 = symptom present]Not appropriate to detect specific anxiety disordersMay have reduced validity in some populations (e.g. Moving forward, it may be warranted to explore these factors more fully and determine if the current measures in use are adequately detecting the presence and severity of symptoms of anxiety that are important to patients or that need to be addressed in the course of medical care. Reasons for the decreased emphasis on the assessment of anxiety in these populations may be multifaceted and include a relative increased emphasis on depression in comparison to anxiety, use of larger scale measures detecting a range of features related to psychological distress (e.g., Symptom Checklist-90), or an under-appreciation of the prevalence and severity of anxiety in many rheumatic conditions. While assessment of some of these features may be beneficial in rheumatology, for example, some studies in other populations have observed posttraumatic stress type reactions to receiving specific medical diagnoses ( 44, 45), these instances are more unique considerations and, therefore, such measures are not included in this review.It becomes evident, based on the brevity of this review, that few stand-alone measures of anxiety are currently used in rheumatology. As mentioned above, measures targeted towards the assessment of specific anxiety disorders including other DSM-IV anxiety disorders (including post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, etc.) are not included in this review.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |